Skip to main content
· 2/24/2014

Initiative & Referendum Institute v. United States Postal Service

Citations

  • 181 F. Supp. 3d 3
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184489
  • 2014 WL 11798506

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that appellate delays are evaluated under the speedy trial framework and \against the traditional standards enunciated in Barker\
  • delay caused by defendant’s dilatory filing practices

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rothstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.