Inhabitants of Paris v. Norway Water Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion where district court denied motion for sentence reduction, in part, based on its evaluation of § 3553(a) factors even though the Government had conceded existence of “extraordinary and compelling reasons”
• “the district court properly looked to [the unamended guideline] as relevant but not binding in determining that [defendant’s] health conditions . . . were not ‘extraordinary and compelling reasons’ warranting a reduction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).