Skip to main content
· 7/15/1839

Inhabitants of Camden v. Inhabitants of Lincolnville

Citations

  • 16 Me. 384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the juvenile court is within its discretion in assigning whatever weight it deems appropriate to the factors listed in the family code
  • undisputed evidence that juvenile “engaged in violent, assaultive behavior on multiple occasions” weighed in favor of trial court’s decision to transfer juvenile to TDCJ
  • explicit retrospective application of sections 61.079(a) and 61.084(g) for those adjudicated on the basis of misdemeanor offenses “demonstrates that the legislature knew how to make a provision retrospective”
  • explicit retrospective application of sections 61.079(a) and 61.084(g) for those adjudicated on the basis of misdemeanor offenses “demonstrates that the legislature knew how to make a provision retrospective”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.