Skip to main content
· 7/1/1874

Inhabitants of Bowdoinham v. Inhabitants of Phippsburg

Citations

  • 63 Me. 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “a party resisting discovery must do more than make conclusory allegations that the requested discovery is unduly burdensome”
  • stating “a party resisting discovery must do more than make conclusory allegations that the requested discovery is unduly burdensome.”
  • “No objection needs to be made to preserve a privilege, and the rules set no time limit - 13 - for asserting a privilege.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Daneorth, Dickerson, Virgin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.