· 7/1/1874
Inhabitants of Bowdoinham v. Inhabitants of Phippsburg
Citations
- 63 Me. 497
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “a party resisting discovery must do more than make conclusory allegations that the requested discovery is unduly burdensome”
- stating “a party resisting discovery must do more than make conclusory allegations that the requested discovery is unduly burdensome.”
- “No objection needs to be made to preserve a privilege, and the rules set no time limit - 13 - for asserting a privilege.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Appleton, Barrows, Daneorth, Dickerson, Virgin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.