Ingres Corp. v. CA, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[l]anguage such as ‘relate to’ or ‘arise out of’” in a forum selection clause “is to be read broadly”
• Litigation in a foreign court weighs in favor of relief when that “court is capable of doing prompt and complete justice.”
• “The reason is that the McWane principle is a default rule of common law, which the parties to the litigation are free to displace by a valid contractual agreement.”
• “The reason is that the McWane principle is a default rule of common law, which the parties to the litigation are free to displace by a valid contractual agreement.”
• “Courts should assess the reasonableness of a forum selection clause on a case-by-case basis.”
• “Forum selection clauses are presumptively valid . . . unless the resisting party clearly shows . . . the clause is invalid for reasons such as fraud and overreaching.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).