Ingredient Technology Corp. v. Nay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where an “action was removed from State court before defendants served their answer and counterclaims, the provisions of Rule 38, and not Rule 81, govern the timeliness of the demand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).