Skip to main content

Ingrassia v. State

Citations

  • 902 So. 2d 357
  • 2005 WL 1335066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the defendant’s objection preserved because before the jury was impaneled, “the trial court specifically and repeatedly reassured counsel, in the course of the extensive colloquy, that the issue was on the record and preserved for appellate review”
  • the court may not preclude a party from inquiry into bias bearing on a matter that is at the heart of the defendant’s case
  • “[A] court may not preclude a party from inquiry into bias bearing on a matter that is at thé heart of the defendant’s case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Ingrassia v. State

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.