· 6/10/1987
Ingrassia v. Ingrassia
Citations
- 509 N.E.2d 729
- 156 Ill. App. 3d 483
- 109 Ill. Dec. 68
- 1987 Ill. App. LEXIS 2588
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding term missing from settlement agreement's college education provision is essentially a price term, so reasonable price is implied
- holding term missing from settlement agreement’s college education provision is essentially a price term, so reasonable price is implied
- reversing award of attorney fees when no proof of service on party could be found in record
- “[although minor defects will be excused, proof of proper service by mail must be made in substantial compliance with” Rule 12
- “no proof of service whatsoever appears in the record. There was therefore no compliance with the requirements of Rule 12.”
- “[w]e are sympathetic with” trial court’s desire to resolve case on date of hearing, improper notice notwithstanding, “in view of the hardship to [counsel]” in traveling long distance to Winnebago courthouse for additional hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lindberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.