Skip to main content
· 6/10/1987

Ingrassia v. Ingrassia

Citations

  • 509 N.E.2d 729
  • 156 Ill. App. 3d 483
  • 109 Ill. Dec. 68
  • 1987 Ill. App. LEXIS 2588

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding term missing from settlement agreement's college education provision is essentially a price term, so reasonable price is implied
  • holding term missing from settlement agreement’s college education provision is essentially a price term, so reasonable price is implied
  • reversing award of attorney fees when no proof of service on party could be found in record
  • “[although minor defects will be excused, proof of proper service by mail must be made in substantial compliance with” Rule 12
  • “no proof of service whatsoever appears in the record. There was therefore no compliance with the requirements of Rule 12.”
  • “[w]e are sympathetic with” trial court’s desire to resolve case on date of hearing, improper notice notwithstanding, “in view of the hardship to [counsel]” in traveling long distance to Winnebago courthouse for additional hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lindberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.