Skip to main content
· 10/31/2017

Ingram v. U.S. of Amercia

Citations

  • 296 F. Supp. 3d 1076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing relevant statutes and appeal rights governing the disciplinary hearing and review process for police officers in non-Civil Service jurisdictions, such as is Newark
  • noting the residuum rule was not violated where inadmissible hearsay evidence was supported by hearsay evidence \properly admitted under N.J.R.E. 803(b)(1)\
  • positing termination appropriate for police officer who displayed a weapon during an off- duty altercation and made dishonest and \inconsistent statements during the course of the internal affairs investigation\
  • finding A-2600-17T1 15 hearsay evidence properly admitted under Rule 803(b)(1) is \competent evidence\
  • referring to hearsay evidence properly admitted under Rule 803(b)(1) as \competent evidence\
  • finding off-duty police officer's involvement in a public altercation justified termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.