Ingram v. Township of Deptford

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that plaintiff made out a prima facie case of discrimination by showing that defendant “held the perception that Plaintiff could not meet the physical demands of the job” due to his “lack of agility”
• finding that plaintiff made out a prima facie case of discrimination by showing that defendant “held the perception that Plaintiff could not meet the physical demands of the job” due to his “lack of agility”
• rejecting Rule 56(d) claim where plaintiff failed to submit an affidavit explaining, among other things, \what efforts have been made to date to obtain that discovery; and why the earlier efforts were unsuccessful\
• rejecting the contention that “87.5% of all employees terminated . . . were over the age of 40” as it failed to meet minimal standards of admissibility because it was not supported by expert analysis
• dismissing Title VII claim because the plaintiff “conceded that no one at the company discussed his religion, and that, in fact, [the plaintiff’s] religion was unknown to [the defendant] during the time [he] was employed.”
• “At the summary judgment stage, the burden of proof that a plaintiff must meet to make out a prima facie case is de minimis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).