Skip to main content
· 2/15/1897

Ingram v. Sumter Music House

Citations

  • 51 S.C. 281
  • 28 S.E. 936
  • 1897 S.C. LEXIS 74

Syllabus

<p>1. Evidence — Written Instruments. — Parol testimony as to contents of a -written instrument should not bé stricken out when admitted without objection, or when it is conflicting as to its contents or existence.</p> <p>2. A Charge responsive to testimony admitted without objection is not erroneous.</p> <p>3. Written Instruments — Jury.—When a written instrument is lost and the parol evidence given of its contents is conflicting, the trial Judge would invade the province of the jury in saying what its terms are.</p>

Judges: Gary

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.