Skip to main content

Ingram v. State

Citations

  • 438 S.E.2d 708
  • 211 Ga. App. 252
  • 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 4560
  • 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 1462

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the allegations contained in the counts of an indictment cannot be materially altered by striking from them or adding to them
  • the allegations contained in the counts of an indictment cannot be materially altered by striking from them or adding to them
  • “One or more acts of [child molestation] being proven to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt satisfies the state’s burden, and additional acts suggested in the indictment could be considered mere surplusage.”
  • if the indictment returned by the grand jury is materially affected by the trial court amending it by striking from or adding to its allegations, “ ‘it becomes void and can not be the basis of a conviction.’ [Cit.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Beasley, Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.