Ingram v. Energy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that witness designations of non-retained experts failed to comply with Rule 26 where the party offered no summary of facts and opinions
• ruling noncompliance with Rule 26(a)(2)(C) where the non-retained expert provided no fact or opinion summary
• reviewing determination of substantial justification or harmlessness for abuse of discretion
• reviewing determination of substantial justification or harmlessness for abuse of discretion
• attachment of treating physician reports to another expert’s report does not satisfy the disclosure requirements of Rule 26

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).