Skip to main content
· 10/21/1998

Ingram v. Earthman

Citations

  • 993 S.W.2d 611
  • 40 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 500
  • 1998 Tenn. App. LEXIS 704
  • 1998 WL 730192

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that if a note is not for a “sum certain,” it is not negotiable
  • holding in a suit on a note, the holder makes out a prima facie case by producing the note signed by the maker and by showing that there is a balance due on the note.
  • “Reversal is required . . . when the special verdict form is confusing or inconsistent with the trial court’s instructions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koch, Lewis, Cantrell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.