Ingram v. Cincinnati, F. & S. E. R. R.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Tjhere is no evidence that [Idaho’s marriage laws] were motivated by a gender discriminatory purpose.”
• “The Court’s principal tasks here are to determine the form of discrimination at issue and next identify and apply the appropriate level of scrutiny.”
• “Idaho’s Marriage Laws deny its gay and lesbian citizens the fundamental right to marry and relegate their families to a stigmatized, second-class status without sufficient reason for doing so. These laws do not withstand any applicable level of constitutional scrutiny.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).