Skip to main content
· 5/20/1960

Ingram Super Market, Inc. v. Major Appliances, Inc.

Citations

  • 121 So. 2d 164
  • 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2589

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that termination under section 2511(a) was proper where mother consistently missed visits due to lack of transportation, and where mother was addicted to cocaine
  • holding orphans’ court properly protected bond between child and foster mother as opposed to attenuated bond between child and his mother forged during irregular visits
  • stating that where there is no evidence of a bond between parent and child, it is reasonable to infer that none exists
  • stating that where there is no evidence of any bond between the parent and child, it is reasonable to infer that no bond exists
  • stating that “where there is no evidence of any bond between parent and child, it is reasonable to infer no bond exists”
  • stating that where there is no evidence of any bond between the parent and child, it is reasonable to infer that no bond exists

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Jjl, Kanner, Shannon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.