Skip to main content
· 10/2/1893

Ingraham v. Schaum & Uhlinger

Citations

  • 157 Pa. 88
  • 27 A. 404
  • 1893 Pa. LEXIS 1403

Syllabus

<p>Contract — Patents—Royalties—Affidavit of defence.</p> <p>Where a person has agreed to pay royalties on all sales that he may make of an unpatented device, he cannot allege as a defence, in an action for the royalties, that, after the agreement was entered into, a patent for the device was refused by the patent office.</p>

Judges: Dean, Green, McCollum, Mitchell, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.