Ingraham v. Clarke & Silverglate, P.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding child’s conduct did not violate section 877.13 where State did not establish that the child acted “with the intention that his behavior impede the successful functioning” of the school or that he acted “with reckless disregard of the effect of his behavior”
• reversing conviction where there was no evidence that the accused acted to create a disturbance or that he acted with reckless disregard of the effect of his behavior

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).