Skip to main content
· 6/20/1997

Inglish v. Union State Bank

Citations

  • 945 S.W.2d 810
  • 1997 WL 7275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that objections to judgment, which disposed of all of plaintiff’s claims when motion for summary judgment was only directed at some, were waived where plaintiff neither challenged this defect in the trial court nor by appeal
  • summary judgment order, entered in response to motion attacking only three of plaintiffs six claims, was final and appealable when reciting that no genuine issues of material fact remained, directing that plaintiff take nothing, and, thus, purporting to be final

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.