Ingle v. Pogue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there is no presumption of irreparable harm arising from copyright infringement unless the harm stemming from the later use of the copyright is qualitatively different from the prior harm so as to be unforeseeable
• “acquiescence in an infringement rebuts the presumption of irreparable harm where the allegedly ‘new’ use does not inflict harm qualitatively different from the harm flowing from the prior infringement” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).