Ingham v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding irreparable harm because plaintiff had “changed its activities” and “diverted scarce resources away from previously planned projects” as a result of agency inaction
• “The [government] defendants . . . cannot suffer harm from an injunction that merely ends an unlawful practice.” (cleaned up)
• reading the case this way

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).