Skip to main content
· 4/17/2008

Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. El Dorado Chemical Co.

Citations

  • 283 S.W.3d 191
  • 373 Ark. 226
  • 2008 Ark. LEXIS 262

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \a majority of states have concluded\ that in order for a contract to incorporate another document \the contract must clearly and specifically reference the document to be incorporated\
  • explaining that the incorporated document must be “known or easily available to the contracting parties”
  • “[A] majori ty of states have concluded that the contract must clearly and specifically reference the document to be incorporated.”
  • “When a contract refers to another writing and makes the terms of that writing a part of the contract, the two documents become a single agreement between the parties and must be construed together.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert L. Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.