· 4/17/2008
Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. El Dorado Chemical Co.
Citations
- 283 S.W.3d 191
- 373 Ark. 226
- 2008 Ark. LEXIS 262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \a majority of states have concluded\ that in order for a contract to incorporate another document \the contract must clearly and specifically reference the document to be incorporated\
- explaining that the incorporated document must be “known or easily available to the contracting parties”
- “[A] majori ty of states have concluded that the contract must clearly and specifically reference the document to be incorporated.”
- “When a contract refers to another writing and makes the terms of that writing a part of the contract, the two documents become a single agreement between the parties and must be construed together.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert L. Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.