Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Asbestos Health

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[W]e have not required a slavish adherence to the [Lozada] 18 requirements, holding only that substantial compliance is necessary.”
• “As we have no statutorily conferred jurisdiction over the actions of the Director, the All Writs Act would not provide this Court with jurisdiction to compel action by the Director.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).