Infusion Resources, Inc. v. Minimed, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• asking whether goods sold to disfavored purchaser were comparable to goods sold to others
• “[A] 59(e) motion to reconsider should not be granted unless . . . the facts alleged . . . could not have been discovered earlier by proper diligence.”
• A “motion to reconsider should not be granted unless . . . the facts alleged are actually newly discovered and could not have been discovered earlier by proper diligence[.]”
• “This Court has held that a 59(e) motion to reconsider should not be granted unless: (1) the facts discovered are of such a nature that they would probably change the outcome; (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).