Information Technology Innovation, LLC v. Motorola, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendants “waived their right to present alternative constructions of the [claim] terms” where plaintiff submitted proposed claim constructions and defendants failed to respond but requested additional time to do so, relying on an indefiniteness argument
• barring defendants, who failed to propose alternate constructions, from proposing claim constructions because to do otherwise would “effectively allow [defendants] to force a delay in the claim construction process”
• “The Court adopts [plaintiffs] unchallenged proposed constructions [] without prejudice to defendants’ later argument concerning indefiniteness.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).