Information Systems & Networks Corp. v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding CDA/ADRA remedy provided 6 comprehensive government contracts dispute regime such that Bivens action was barred
• finding that case was “essentially one sounding in contract” because “[t]he core” of plaintiff’s claim was “the government’s failure to extend [plaintiff] another option, a clear contractual issue”
• finding no standing for the subcontractor under Ahmdahl, and stating that “subcontractors are not intended for protection under CICA”
• differentiating the case at hand, which involved a plaintiff complaining of wrongful termination of its own contract, from “disappointed” or “frustrated” bidder actions involving contractors seeking to void the award of a con- tract to another

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).