Information Services Group, Inc. v. Rawlinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[V]isits to Texas that are unrelated to the claims asserted are insufficient to establish specific jurisdiction.”
• “Merely contracting with a Texas company does not constitute purposeful availment for jurisdictional purposes. . . . Nor does simply being employed by a Texas company.”
• “Even if we assume that Rawlinson ultimately obtained confidential information from the Texas-based servers and gave it to EquaTerra in breach of the various restrictive covenants with the appellants, there is no allegation or evidence that he did so in Texas.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).