Skip to main content
· 5/24/2002

Information Resources, Inc. v. The Dun and Bradstreet Corporation, A.C. Nielsen Company, and I.M.S. International, Inc.

Citations

  • 294 F.3d 447
  • 52 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 905
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 9833
  • 2002 WL 1041384

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n 3 order dismissing only a portion of a claim” is a “non‐final ruling” and “[s]uch a 4 ruling may not be certified.”
  • “If the district court 2 enters judgment on something less than a final disposition of an entire claim, the Rule 54(b) 3 judgment is improper . . . .”
  • non-final rulings include orders dismissing only 17 a portion of a claim
  • “determination that there is no just reason for delay” supported by “reasoned, even if brief, explanation” is “left to the sound judicial discretion of the district court and is to be exercised in the interest of sound judicial administration.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pooler, Sotomayor, Garaufis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.