Information Handling Services, Inc. v. Defense Automated Printing Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that summary judgment “ordinarily” is proper only after discovery (quoting Americable Int’l, Inc. v. Dep’t of Navy, 129 F.3d 1271, 1274 (D.C. Cir. 1997))
• explaining that summary judgment “ordinarily” is proper only after discovery (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Americable Int’l, Inc. v. Dep’t of Navy, 129 F.3d 1271, 1274 (D.C. Cir. 1997))
• disagreeing with the district court’s finding that plaintiff lacked standing but proceeding to the merits of the dispute
• disagreeing with the district court’s finding that plaintiff lacked standing but proceeding to the merits of the dispute
• disagreeing with the district court’s finding that plaintiff lacked standing but proceeding to the merits of the dispute
• “[A] plaintiff’s non-frivolous contention regarding the meaning of a statute must be taken as correct for purposes of standing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).