Infodek, Inc. v. Meredith-Webb Printing Co., Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that to resolve merger question, the Court must consider “whether there are various means available to achieve the [work’s] desired purpose or function”
• \[T]he intrinsic function of a technical drawing is to convey information....\ (citing Eales v. Envtl. Lifestyles, Inc. , 958 F.2d 876 , 879-80 (9th. Cir. 1992) as amended (May 11, 1992), abrogated on other grounds by Hunt v. Pasternack , 179 F.3d 683 (9th Cir. 1999) )

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).