Info-Hold, Inc. v. Muzak LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding allegation that defendant’s unfulfilled promise to “look again” at a patent after plaintiff raised questions about the possibility of infringement sufficient to raise an issue of material fact regarding willful blindness
• reversing district court’s grant of summary judgment based on absence of damages in a patent case after determining that there was “record evidence to demonstrate the existence of a genuine issue of material fact” as to a reasonable royalty
• “a patentee’s failure to show that its royalty estimate is correct is insufficient grounds for awarding a royalty of zero.”
• “[A] patentee’s failure to show that its royalty estimate is correct is insufficient grounds for awarding a royalty of zero.”
• “Claims must be interpreted with an eye toward giving effect to all terms in the claim”
• “Claims must be interpreted with an eye toward giving effect to all terms in the claim.” (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).