Skip to main content
· 3/17/2011

Infinity General Insurance Co. v. Litton

Citations

  • 707 S.E.2d 885
  • 308 Ga. App. 497
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 826
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 225

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The hallmark of contract construction is to ascertain the intention of the parties.” (punctuation omitted)
  • “ the construction, interpretation and legal effect of a contract are issues of law which are subject to de novo review”
  • “[T]he insurer] was entitled to judgment, as a matter of law, that the 2007 policy provided UM coverage of $50,000 per person, as indicated on the policy’s declarations page”
  • As with other types of contracts, when the terms of an insurance contract are clear and unambiguous, the court is to look to the contract alone to find the parties’ intent.
  • As with other types of contracts, when the terms of an insurance contract are clear and unambiguous, the court is to look to the contract alone to find the parties’ intent.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Phipps, Miller, McFadden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.