· 3/17/2011
Infinity General Insurance Co. v. Litton
Citations
- 707 S.E.2d 885
- 308 Ga. App. 497
- 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 826
- 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 225
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The hallmark of contract construction is to ascertain the intention of the parties.” (punctuation omitted)
- “ the construction, interpretation and legal effect of a contract are issues of law which are subject to de novo review”
- “[T]he insurer] was entitled to judgment, as a matter of law, that the 2007 policy provided UM coverage of $50,000 per person, as indicated on the policy’s declarations page”
- As with other types of contracts, when the terms of an insurance contract are clear and unambiguous, the court is to look to the contract alone to find the parties’ intent.
- As with other types of contracts, when the terms of an insurance contract are clear and unambiguous, the court is to look to the contract alone to find the parties’ intent.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Phipps, Miller, McFadden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.