Skip to main content
· 4/19/2016

Inficon, Inc. v. Verionix, Inc.

Citations

  • 182 F. Supp. 3d 32
  • 2016 WL 1611379
  • 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52708

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • N.J.S.A. 2A:15-7(b) enacted to address the due process implications—the “taking of property”—that the filing of a notice of lis pendens comprises
  • “[S]ince a copy of the Notice must be served on the defendant in the pending action it is illogical and indeed may be unconstitutional to permit the filing of the Notice against the property interest of a person who is not a named defendant in that action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.