Infantes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the State to pose unrelated hypothetical scenarios to the prospective jurors to determine whether the prospective jurors could correctly apply the law
• “We find no abuse of discretion in the trial courts refusal to reread the first officers testimony and instructing the jury to rely on its collective memory.”
• \We find no abuse of discretion in the trial courts refusal to reread the first officers testimony and instructing the jury to rely on its collective memory.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).