Ines Torres Vargas v. Dr. Manuel Santiago Cummings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining Section 4105 immunity is an affirmative defense; therefore, defendant bears the burden of establishing and proffering evidence sufficient to establish employee status.
• explaining Article 41.050 immunity is an affirmative defense; therefore, “defendant bears the burden of establishing its applicability.”
• \The party who has the burden of proof on a dispositive issue cannot attain summary judgment unless the evidence that he provides on that issue is conclusive.\
• summary judgment appropriate where extrinsic 10 evidence presented to the court supports only one of the 11 conflicting interpretations
• summary judgment appropriate where extrinsic 18 evidence presented to the court supports only one of the 19 conflicting interpretations
• summary judgment appropriate where extrinsic 10 evidence presented to the court supports only one of the 11 conflicting interpretations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).