Skip to main content
· 6/20/1977

Industro Motive Corp. v. Morris Agency, Inc.

Citations

  • 256 N.W.2d 607
  • 76 Mich. App. 390
  • 1977 Mich. App. LEXIS 927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that a new insurance policy was effectively a renewal after the plaintiff’s insurance agent informed the plaintiff that it “could supply identical coverage at a reduced rate” from a different insurance provider
  • insurer estopped from relying on 20 percent coverage limitation in policy because of affirmative representations that insured was 50 percent covered
  • Insurer and agent held to be estopped to deny that policy protected the insured to the extent of the coverage which had been requested by the insured.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Burns, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.