Industrial Parts Distributors, Inc. v. Fram Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although a pre-MRPC case based on Canons 4 [“A lawyer should preserve the confidences and secrets of a client.”] and 9 [“A lawyer should avoid even the appearance of impropriety.”], it involved an MRPC 1.9(b)-type fact situation in which disqualification was denied

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).