Industrial Mutual Association, Inc. v. Amalgamated Workers, Local Union No. 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that, because an award was indefinite, it was not final and further explaining that the doctrine of functus officio is not violated where arbitrator clarifies an award that was never terminated
• noting that because an award was indefinite, it was not final and further explaining that the doctrine of functus officio is not violated where arbitrator clarifies an award that was never terminated
• “A remand is proper, both at common law and under the federal law of labor arbitration contracts, to clarify an ambiguous award or to require the arbitrator to address an issue submitted to him but not resolved by the award.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).