Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Apple Computer, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that insurer could rely on trademark exclusion because “all the facts indicated” that any claims of false designation of origin and unfair competition “arose solely from the conduct by Apple amounting to trademark infringement”
• IP exclusion applies to breach of contract claim “because all the facts indicated that any such claims arose solely from conduct by [the insured] amounting to trademark infringement”
• punctuation and placement of phrases in an exclusion relevant to determine meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).