Industrial Commission v. Duncan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming district court’s exclusion of opinion testimony of company physician due to late disclosure
• “We accord the trial court broad discretion in the admissibility of expert testimony. We interfere only if clear abuse is shown.” (citation omitted)
• “Exclusion of evidence is the most severe sanction available under the rule, and is justified only when prejudice would result. Exclusion should not be imposed lightly; other sanctions are available such as continuation of the trial or limitation of testimony.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).