Industrial Commission v. C & D Pipeline, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding statute - 8 - unconstitutional because “[i]t permits no discretion whatsoever” in “requiring public authorities to accept the terms of employment fixed by [labor unions]”
• calling the “Arizona Public Works Act, A.R.S. § 34-321, et seq.” the “Little Davis-Bacon Act”
• “[I]t is a fundamental principle of statutory construction that a statute should be considered as a whole.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).