Skip to main content
· 8/18/1992

INDUS. CAS. v. Consultant Assocs.

Citations

  • 603 So. 2d 1355
  • 1992 WL 197882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant could reasonably anticipate being haled into court in Florida where it had contracted with a Florida corporation, all of the services were to be performed in Florida, and payment was due in Florida.
  • foreign corporation had sufficient minimum contacts with Florida to subject it to jurisdiction in this state where it contracted with a Florida corporation, performed its services in Florida and con tracted to pay for its services in Florida

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbitt, Jorgenson and Goderich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.