Second Circuit· 3/3/1924
Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Errett
Citations
- 297 F. 733
- 1924 U.S. App. LEXIS 2884
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[B]efore one may be held for contributory infringement, it must be shown that he had knowingly done some act without which the infringement would not have occurred”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.Supreme Court· 2011-05-31· cited 600×
- Republic of China v. American Express Co., Inc.Second Circuit· 1951-06-12· cited 82×
- B. B. Chemical Co. v. EllisFirst Circuit· 1941-02-21· cited 23×
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Precise Mfg. Corp.Second Circuit· 1926-03-08· cited 18×
- Jones v. Radio Corporation of AmericaS.D. New York· 1955-04-26· cited 16×
- Duplex Envelope Co. v. Denominational Envelope Co.Fourth Circuit· 1935-11-12· cited 13×
- Detroit Lubricator Co. v. ToussaintN.D. Illinois· 1944-10-24· cited 9×
- American Patents Development Corp. v. Carbice Corp. of AmericaSecond Circuit· 1930-02-03· cited 8×
- Beidler v. Photostat CorporationW.D. New York· 1935-03-30· cited 7×
- Crayne v. CrayneNevada Supreme Court· 1932-08-04· cited 5×
- Leesona Corp. v. Cotwool Manufacturing Corp.W.D. South Carolina· 1962-01-26· cited 5×
- Elevator Appliance Co. v. BrooksSecond Circuit· 1939-02-06· cited 4×
- General Foods Corp. v. Seeman Bros.S.D. New York· 1932-08-02· cited 3×
- American Lecithin Co. v. J. C. Ferguson Mfg. Works, Inc.D. Rhode Island· 1937-04-27· cited 3×
- Freedman v. FriedmanD. Maryland· 1956-06-20· cited 2×
- Perfect Tailboards v. National Bent Steel Corp.E.D. New York· 1939-05-05· cited 2×
- Gauvin v. SmithD. Connecticut· 1939-01-23
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court· 1917-04-09· cited 365×
- Henry v. A. B. Dick Co.Supreme Court· 1912-03-11· cited 216×
- Morgan Envelope Co. v. Albany Perforated Wrapping Paper Co.Supreme Court· 1894-03-19· cited 196×
- Leeds & Catlin Co. v. Victor Talking MacHine Co.Supreme Court· 1909-04-19· cited 184×
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court· 1909-04-19· cited 135×
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Sixth Circuit· 1896-10-12· cited 106×
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Kelsey Electric Railway Specialty Co.Second Circuit· 1896-07-29· cited 35×
- Armstrong v. Belding Bros.Second Circuit· 1924-02-04· cited 21×
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Kelsey Electric Railway Specialty Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut· 1896-03-02· cited 17×
- Edison Electric Light Co. v. Peninsular Light, Power & Heat Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan· 1899-06-13· cited 15×
- Cortelyou v. Charles E. Johnson & Co.Second Circuit· 1906-03-10· cited 14×
- Tubular Rivet & Stud Co. v. O'BrienU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts· 1898-07-29· cited 13×
- Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Public Service Cup Co.Second Circuit· 1918-02-26· cited 9×
- Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. TrentU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California· 1899-01-23· cited 9×
- Imperial Machine & Foundry Corp. v. American Machinery Co.S.D. New York· 1921-05-02· cited 7×
- Imperial Mach. Co. v. ReesS.D. New York· 1919-11-06· cited 5×
- Millner v. SchofieldU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia· 1881-06-15· cited 1×
Other cases named Individual Drinking Cup Co. v. Errett
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.