Indiaweekly. Com, LLC v. Nehaflix. Com, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a tortious interference claim based upon fraud was not subject to a heightened pleading requirement because the complainant alleged an “improper motive”
• “No 26 court in this district has ever dismissed a Lanham Act claim for failure to comply with Rule 9(b), nor has the Second Circuit ever held that it should”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).