Indianapolis Elks Building Corp. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that taxpayer's facilities and activities suppressed human want and suffering, but not to the degree required to qualify for a tax exemption
• stating that in Indiana, \charity\ is to be given the broadest meaning constitutionally possible
• taxpayer’s contributions were not enough to warrant an exemption.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).