Indiana v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a final merits decision before the Supreme Court could not establish the strength of the prevailing position because “unfounded claims sometimes, for a variety of reasons, survive beyond their just desserts”
• litigant who was entitled to full indemnification of attorneys' fees by her employer did not \incur\ any expenses under EAJA
• Government litigation position “merits decisions... whether intermediate or final, cannot, standing alone, determine the substantial justification issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).