Indiana Novelty Mfg. Co. v. Smith Mfg. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Lone Pine orders can be useful devices but cautioning that they are not a “substitute for ... a motion for summary judgment.”
• “A Lone Pine order should issue only ... after the defendant has made a showing of significant evidence calling into question the plaintiffs’ ability to bring forward necessary medical causation and other scientific information.”
• “Lone Pine orders are permitted by Rule 16(e)(2)(L
• “Lone Pine orders are permitted by Rule 16(c)(2)(L

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).