Indiana Gaming Co., LP v. Blevins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that technicians were not third-party beneficiaries to contract, despite provision requiring that technicians be paid union wages for work
• holding that technicians were not third-party beneficiaries to contract, despite provision requiring that technicians be paid union wages for work
• \shall\ language in agreement necessitates certain parties be included as third-party beneficiaries

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).