Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Horizon Bancorp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that unambiguous statutes must be read to mean what they plainly express, and their plain meanings may not be enlarged or restricted
• explaining that the plain and obvious meaning of an unambiguous statute may not be enlarged or restricted
• stating that unambiguous statutes must be read to mean what they plainly express, and their plain meanings may not be enlarged or restricted
• stating that “[njothing may be read into a statute .which is not within the manifest intention of the legislature as gathered from the statute itself’ (citation omitted)
• “nothing may be read into a statute which is not within the manifest intention of the legislature” as ascertained from “the plain and obvious meaning” of the words of the statute
• \nothing may be read into a statute which is not within the manifest intention of the legislature\ as ascertained from \the plain and obvious meaning\ of the words of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).