· 5/27/1980
Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Endress & Hauser, Inc.
Citations
- 404 N.E.2d 1173
- 76 Ind. Dec. 243
- 1980 Ind. App. LEXIS 1470
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that where it appears the Legislature amends a statute to express its original intention more clearly, the normal presumption that an amendment changes a statute’s meaning 9 does not apply
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ratliff, Robertson, Neal
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.